Holtec is the company which 'purchased' the Pilgrim Nuclear Power Plant in 2019 from Entergy Corporation. In essence, it paid a nominal amount the Entergy in order to assume responsibility for decommissioning the facility. Why would it do such a thing? Because with that purchase, Holtec received access to the Pilgrim decommissioning fund, which held a little over $1 billion in ratepayer money to be used for decommissioning. Any monies left over in the fund once the job is done is Holtec’s to keep. As a result, Holtec is incentivized to spend as little as possible.
As part of the decommissioning process, Holtec needs to 'dispose' of over 1 million gallons of radioactive water that was used in the spent-fuel pool, the reactor cavity, and other systems. Three options are under consideration.
The first is to release the water, after some filtering, into Cape Cod Bay in batches of 20,000 gallons. This is the method favored by Holtec, and is the cheapest.
The second option is to evaporate the water. In a public statement last month, Holtec said this option would require large amounts of electricity and possibly a diesel generator to produce enough heat.
The third option would be to truck the water out of state to a licensed disposal facility. This is the method currently being used by NorthStar, the company decommissioning the Vermont Yankee nuclear plant. Holtec has objected to this approach, citing the potential danger of an accident in that process.
Entergy had in past released radioactive water into Plymouth Bay, with notice to, and approval by, the Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC). However, the Holtec plan was to release nearly three times more than has ever been released in a single year. Additionally, there are concerns that the water to be released may contain pollutants other than radioactivity, which would be prohibited under the plant’s discharge permits, and would require separate approval by the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).
The Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection (MADEP) has issued decision stating that such disposal would violate the Ocean Sanctuaries Act as the water to be disposed of would constitute a pollutant. Holtec has appealed the determination, arguing that it's actions are governed by a permit issued prior to the adoption of the Ocean Sanctuaries Act, and therefore it is not subject to its restrictions. While the appeal is pending (it could take a year to decide), no water will be dumped into the bay, but instead wil continue to evaporate into the atmospherer, sometihng which has also been opposed by residents as being equally harmful to the environment.
You can read the MADEP Ruling and the Holtec Appeal below.
Holtec Appeals the Determination
The Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection (MADEP) has issued decision stating that Holtec's proposed disposal would violate the Ocean Sanctuaries Act as the water to be disposed of would constitute a pollutant.
Holtec argues that because its operating permit predates the Ocean Sanctuaries Act that law does notgovern its operations, including its ability to dump radioactive water into Cape Cod Bay.
Public Comment Period Before Final Determination
The Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protect (MADEP) has issued a Tentative Determination denying the request of Holtec Decommissioning International, LLC (Holtec) to dump 1 million+ gallons of radioactive wastewater from the former Pilgrim Nuclear Power Station (Pilgrim) into Cape Cod Bay. A copy of the Tentative Determination can be found below.
As part of its plan for decommissioning Pilgrim, Holtec sought to discharge 1.1 million gallons of wastewater that are being held in various portions of the remaining facility. Despite local opposition, Holtec simply “announced” that it was allowed to proceed with this dumping under its existing permits and thus intended to do so. However, on June 17, 2022, the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) issued a letter to Holtec advising that its existing permits, notably its EPA permit issued under the National Pollution Discharge Elimination System (NPDES), did not allow for such discharge. Holtec subsequently filed applications to modify its EPA permit, as well as its MADEP permit and its Nuclear Regulatory Agency permit to allow it to discharge the wastewater into Cape Cod Bay. The MADEP Tentative Determination is the first decision on those applications.
In its proposed denial of the MADEP permit modification, the MADEP has focused its decision on the requirements of the Ocean Sanctuaries Act (“Act”), M.G.L. c. 132A, §§ 12A – 18. Cape Cod Bay falls within the definition of Ocean Sanctuary under the Act. Section 15 of the Act prohibits the “dumping or discharge of commercial, municipal, domestic or industrial wastes” into ocean sanctuaries. M.G.L. c. 132A, § 15(4). The MADEP found that:
"The water is stored in the spent fuel pool, torus, dryer separator, and reactor cavity, was utilized in the Facility’s industrial operations, is contaminated, and is now proposed to be discarded."
Therefore, according to Holtec’s application and the definition of “wastes” contained in the Massachusetts regulations, the water Holtec is proposing to discharge is industrial waste, the dumping of which is prohibited under the Act.
In its modification application, Holtec cited to certain narrow exemptions to the Act’s prohibition against discharges into ocean sanctuaries. For instance, Section 16 of the Act exempts “activities, uses and facilities associated with the generation, transmission, and distribution of electrical power.” M.G.L. c. 132A, § 16. However, Pilgrim has long ceased electrical power generation. Moreover, the MADEP noted that the waters proposed for discharge have been used for decommissioning processes, including dismantlement of plant systems, and their disposal is required as part of the decommissioning process. Since the proposed discharge is associated with decommissioning of Pilgrim, and not the generation, transmission, or distribution of electric power, this exception does not apply.
Holtec also cited to an exemption for “the operation and maintenance of existing municipal, commercial or industrial facilities and discharges.” Its argument was that because there has been prior discharges into Cape Cod Bay, future discharges should also be permitted. However, the MADEP found that there are currently no discharges from Pilgrim, and such discharges are now explicitly prohibited by Holtec’s MADEP permit, which was issued on January 30, 2020. Since this new proposed discharge is not the continuation of an existing discharge, the exception does not apply.
There is now a 30 day “public comment” period before the MADEP issues its Final Determination on the Holtec application. during which the MADEP will accept public Comments can be submitted to MassDEP electronically at massdep.npdes@mass.gov. Written comments can be submitted to:
MassDEP Surface Water Discharge Permitting Program
100 Cambridge St., Suite 900
Boston, MA 02114.
Those wishing to read more may find the following links helpful:
Boston Globe (Reload if Subscription Pop-Up Appears)
Directs its legal counsel to send demand to Holtec
In a letter sent on behalf of the Town of Duxbury, its legal counsel has asseted that any radioactive water release by Holtec would violate a 2020 settlement agreement between Holtec and the Commonwealth of Massachusetts.
Contrary to statements being made by other Holtec representatives, the CEO of Holtec, Kris Singh, has already rejected the idea of transporting radioactive wastewater at the Pilgrim site to a licensed disposal facility. He did so in a letter to Sen. Edward Markey (D. Mass.) dated June 6, 2022, following a public hearing a month earlier. In his letter, Mr. Singh states, "We have pointed out that the suggestion made in the hearing to ship the water to another location for discharge runs counter to the basic tenets of environmental justice, which has led us to discard the idea." Curiously, Mr. Singh fails to note that Holtec is already transporting other radioactive materials from the Pilgrim site to disposal facilities in other states. Not surprisingly, Mr. Singh does reference the added cost Holtec would incur in properly disposing of the radioactive water in question. Mr. Singh's statement is consistent with other communications issued by Holtec.
While Holtec may be 'rejecting' the shipment alternative, the ultimate decision may not be up them. That is because Holtec needs permission from both the Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) and the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) for such action. And the EPA has now made it clear that Holtec doesn't have such permission under its existing permis.
In a Public Information Sheet (which can be viewed below), Holtec indicated that per its existing permits, once treated, it was allowed to proceed with the release of spent fuel pond water into Plymouth Bay, as had been done before by Entergy. However, in a June 17, 2022 letter to Holtec, EPA Region 1 Water Director Ken Moraff rejected that assertion.
Director Moraff specifically noted that the method od disposal of the water in question was not included in the original permit as there was insufficient information provided by Holtec's predecessor, Entergy, regarding the potential impacts of the proposed discharge. Moreover, he reminded Holtc that while it has previously appealed certain portions of the applicable permit, it did not appeal the section whch relates to disposal. Accordingly, Holtec will need to obtain a new EPA permit if it wishes to proceed with the release into Plymouth Bay. Director Morff's full letter can be read below.
Senator Edward J. Markey (D-Mass.), Chair of the Environment and Public Works Subcommittee on Clean Air, Climate and Nuclear Safety, announced that the subcommittee will hold a field hearing on Friday, May 6, 2022, in Plymouth. The subcommittee will discuss policies regarding the decommissioning process for nuclear plants such as the Pilgrim Nuclear Station, including nuclear safety and security issues and state, local, and community stakeholder engagement. The hearing will take place at Plymouth Town Hall in the 1820 Courtroom. Additional details on the hearing, including witnesses and livestream information, will be announced in the coming weeks.
Read the letter to the Nuclear Regulartory Commission sent by the Superintendent of the Stellwagen Bank National Marine Sanctuary opposing the Holtec radioactive water release
220314 NRC-EPA Holtec (pdf)
DownloadClick below for an excellent chronology of events relating to the Pilgrim Nuclear Power Plant prepared by the Jones River Landing Environmental Heritage Center.
Four members of Massachusetts' congressional delegation (Senators Warren and Markey and Representatives Keating and Moulton) have signed a letter opposing the discharge.
Our State representatives have sponsored two bills currently pending in the State legislature that would prohibit such discharges; H4444 (Reps. Cutler and LaNatra) and S2791 (Sen. Moran).
A number of Town (South Shore and Cape) and State representatives appeared at a rally on April 9, 2022, to speak in opposition to any release into Cape Cod Bay. The rally was organized by those whole livelihoods depend on the health of Cape Cod Bay.